Christian Dominionism: Follow the Money

This is the text of the speech I gave last weekend at the Secularism Australia Conference. Many thanks to the organisers for asking me to speak on this important subject.

I believe urgent action needs to be taken to head off the Americanisation of Australian politics at the pass. I have spent 12 years following Christian dominionism and Christian nationalism, and the last 3 months undertaking intensive research into the libertarian networks behind these movements.

Issues like prayers in parliament and chaplains in schools and the military are important. I don’t want to take away from the people putting their efforts into these issues. But the matches to light these ‘fires’ are being supplied by foreign networks. If those networks are not challenged we’ll be playing “whack-a-mole” with church/state separation until the second coming of Christ.

I am convinced the only thing that will succeed is for all of those affected by the cancerous political ideology I describe below: atheists, secularists, rationalists, humanists together with feminists, educators, unions, voluntary assisted dying lobbyists, advocates for women’s reproductive choice, LGBTIQ+ groups, environmentalists, climate change activist, medical bodies, and more, to band together and pool our financial and intellectual resources.

As I say below, progressive, wealthy benefactors do exist and we have the potential to be able to fight back if we can get some funding and mount a professional campaign.

This is not my area of expertise. I’ve tried something similar before and failed. I will continue to research and write about this and scream into the abyss and hope someone with vision and energy will hear and take up the challenge. What is needed is a highly professional, strategic, holistic counter-attack. If we don’t fight back, and quickly, Australian democracy is at stake.

Chrys Stevenson

Christian Dominionism: Follow the Money

For all its faults, Australia is a free and democratic country with, generally, sensible attitudes towards religion and one of the best electoral systems in the world. It’s easy to be complacent and imagine this could never change. 

I’ve been researching the rise of Christian dominionism – a very close cousin of Christian nationalism – for the last 12 years. It’s an ideology that teaches that Jesus will not return to earth until his followers have established a global theocracy which will see Old Testament Biblical Law enforced across every nation. 

The dominionists’ plan for achieving Total World Domination is called the Seven Mountains Mandate

Followers of this ideology are encouraged, trained and mentored, to infiltrate and conquer the Seven Mountains of Influence. 

These “mountains” represent: 

  • Government (including law, the military, and our electoral system) 
  • Business (including unions)
  • Education
  • Media and the Arts 
  • Entertainment
  • Religion, and 
  • the Family. 

The Seven Mountains Mandate is a political strategy devised and promoted by a large, but nebulous group, called the New Apostolic Reformation. The NAR’s leaders, revered as “prophets” and “apostles”, aspire, eventually, to sit atop each one of these mountains on every nation on earth – at which point Jesus will return to rapture them to eternal glory in Heaven. 

You may never have heard of the New Apostolic Reformation and that’s just how they like it. But Apostolic networks are among the fastest growing movements in the modern Christian world.

You may be surprised to hear that, according to ChurchWatch Central – an Australian group of concerned pastors, elders and church-goers – the New Apostolic Reformation is associated with over 1000 churches here in Australia. 

The aim of the NAR’s Seven Mountains strategy is for evangelical Christians to infiltrate governments and the public institutions which surround them; quietly building power and influence within those institutions, with the objective of gaining complete control.  

If you look at this as a Christian movement, there is so much about dominionism that just doesn’t make sense. 

Tim Costello from Australia’s Centre for Public Christianity shares my sense of puzzlement about why fundamentalist Christians would embrace a political agenda so totally antithetical to the teachings of Jesus. He says:

“How do you preach Jesus’ love of enemies and defend gun ownership or separate children from parents and place them in cages at the Texan border? 

And how do you reduce the Gospel to securing Supreme Court appointments simply so they will overturn Roe v Wade? 

Why would you suppress telling the truth in schools about US racial history by dismissing it as “woke”? 

According to Reverend Costello:

“You do all that by engaging in a political Christianity that wants to rule.”

Professor Samuel Perry, a leading expert on Christian nationalism, suggests we should look on it as a kind of “impostor Christianity.”  

Russell Moore, formerly a top official with the Southern Baptist Convention and now the editor-in-chief of Christianity Today, says this is Christianity, radicalized to the point that some American pastors cannot preach the Sermon on the Mount, without being heckled for endorsing “woke” liberal talking points.

In order to understand why people who call themselves Christians also oppose government welfare, public schools, gun control and action on climate change, I decided to follow the money.  

What I discovered was an unholy alliance between evangelical Christians affiliated with the New Apostolic Reformation’s Seven Mountains strategy, and a league of ultra-wealthy libertarians who operate a complex, international network of right-wing think-tanks – many of which fall under the umbrella of a group known as the Atlas Network

The ideology expressed in this coalition is called paleolibertarianism – nothing to do with Paleo-Pete. 

Here’s how it works: the Christians took on the libertarians’ economic agenda. In return, the ultra-wealthy libertarians encouraged the politicians who benefit from their donations to endorse the dominionists’ religious agenda. Why? Because the Christians provide the ultra-wealthy with a voting bloc to get their agents into power and remove the taxes and regulations which impact negatively on the unfettered accumulation of wealth.  

Surprisingly, the aims of Christian dominionists and nationalists and the ultra-wealthy libertarians dovetail neatly. The libertarians see democracy as an inconvenient obstacle to free market capitalism. The Christians see democracy as an impediment to instituting Biblical Law. 

In America, the Baptist Joint Committee for Religious Liberty and the Freedom from Religion Foundation have banded together to fight Christian nationalism. Their report on the involvement of Christian nationalists in the January 6 insurrection describes how this mutual back-scratching works:

“The [Christian nationalist] movement threw its support behind Mr. Trump at a critical moment, delivering to him the Republican Party’s most reliable slice of electoral votes. He in turn gave the movement everything he had promised them: power and political access, access to public money, policies favorable to their agenda, and above all the appointment of hard-right judges.” 

Speaking to a gathering of religious right activists in 2021, Senator Lindsey Graham boasted:

“Bottom line is President Trump delivered, don’t you think?” 

Public support for Trump and the paleolibertarian agenda has been boosted by scare campaigns warning that voting for progressive candidates will lead the United States towards socialism or communism. But, in a delicious touch of irony, I discovered the Seven Mountains strategy was not, as its proponents claim, delivered by revelation direct from God; they pretty much plagiarized it from the work of Marxist philosopher, Antonio Gramsci. 

Gramsci and his followers devised a strategy to overturn capitalism by gaining control of the eight Ideological State Apparatuses – an almost identical list to the Seven Mountains. 

You have to admit, it takes a certain kind of hubris for rabid anti-communists to pinch an actual communist plot and rebrand it as “the Word of God.”

The Seven Mountains strategy is working. If a Republican wins the US election in 2024, the white-anting of American democracy will continue in earnest. 

Trump has already flagged his intention to dismiss up to 50,000 secular civil servants and replace them with Trumpist, paleolibertarian, loyalists. That’s the Seven Mountains strategy on steroids! 

This can all seem very US-centric but I am convinced that what is happening in America – and in South America, Europe, and now in New Zealand – will play out next in Australia. 

Australian, Clare Heath-McIvor, was raised in a dominionist church in Victoriawhere her father is the pastor. Brian Heath’s City Builders church was affiliated with ISAAC – the International Strategic Alliance of Apostolic Churches – a kind of south-east Asian branch of the New Apostolic Reformation. As part of that group, Clare remembers being encouraged to chant:

“What time is it? – It’s time to take over.”

In an article for the Australian Rationalist Society last year, Clare warned that Christian nationalism is a bonafide threat to democracy. And she insisted, “Australians need to step on this now.”  

I don’t want to turn this into a McCarthyist kind of witch-hunt. The extent to which these ideologies are embraced by evangelical Christians and libertarians exists on a spectrum. That said, the destruction of democracy is enthusiastically embraced by paleolibertarian leaders and they have a significant following, even here in Australia.

Take this, from Pastor Ian Shelton’s Toowoomba City Church. Back in 2011 when I first embarked on this research, the church’s website described Shelton’s goal to turn Toowoomba into:

“… a transformed city where all the spheres – sport, arts, leisure, welfare, health, media & information, law, police, judiciary, politics & government, business & commerce, & education … come under the lordship of Christ.”

And, while a little church in Toowoomba can seem like small potatoes, remember there are at least 1000 churches around Australia preaching the same doctrine.

Tell me, how would politicians respond if it were 1000 mosques, backed by a global international network, urging their followers to take control of this country’s democratic institutions by stealth?

We can’t be complacent. We have already seen a Pentecostal prime minister secretly appointing himself to no less than five Federal government ministries. We have seen Christian nationalists stacking Liberal party branches in Western AustraliaSouth Australia and Victoria.

Last year, a roadmap came to light, outlining how the religious right could infiltrate the Liberal Party with godly candidates. 

We have heard how the Gold Coast Mayor appointed a “spiritual advisor” with her own office and six-figure salary. And she’s insisted that the mayor ecstatically agreed to help her implement the Seven Mountains strategy on the glitter strip. 

In northern NSW, a National Party candidate declared: 

“I want to bring God’s kingdom to the political arena. And I want God’s kingdom to penetrate the political mountain.”

As secularists our eyes have been fixed firmly on the Christian component of this kooky confederation of Christianity and cash. And if we just look at them it’s easy to tell ourselves they couldn’t organize a school picnic, let alone a bloodless coup. 

We have to realise that the Christians are the circus: the brains, the money, the power and the real strategy is in the far-right libertarian think-tanks which support them. 

Recently,  Dr Jeremy Walker of Sydney’s University of Technology, alerted us to the activities of the Atlas Network here in Australia. Substantially funded by billionaire, Charles Koch, and a number of multi-nationals with interests in fossil fuels and tobacco, Atlas is the network that enlisted the Christian dominionists and nationalists of the New Apostolic Reformation to build the Tea Party movement and infiltrate the Republican Party.

In Australia, the Atlas Network claims eight think-tanks as “partners” including the Centre for Independent Studies, the Institute of Public Affairs, the Australian Institute for Progress and LibertyWorks – the organisation which brought the Conservative Political Action Conference to Australia. 

According to Jeremy, Atlas itself is not a think tank. Rather, it is the “mother-of-all-think-tanks.” It’s an umbrella organisation which provides seed-funding and strategic guidance to 515 libertarian think-tanks across nearly 100 countries – and co-ordinates their activities. This is important. 

They represent themselves as independent voices, but they are involved in strategic campaigns co-ordinated by a foreign interest group.

Many of those pulling the strings in the Atlas Network are also members of another far-right group, the Mont Pelerin Society, whose members have included our own John Howard, mining lobbyist, Hugh Morgan, co-founders of the Centre for Independent Studies, Greg Lindsay and Maurice Newman, and John Roskam – until recently the executive director of the Institute of Public Affairs.

There is also a close association between the Atlas Network and Jordan Peterson’s newly formed Alliance for Responsible Citizenship, which recently held a conference in London. One of the two shareholders in the ARC,  the Legatum Institute, is also an Atlas Network partner.

There are six Australians on the ARC’s advisory board which also includes includes two pastors, a professor of religion and Mike Johnson, the new Republican speaker, who we know has strong affiliations with Christian dominionism.  Of the 1500 people who attended their London conference, a whopping 10 per cent were Australians – many of them leading Liberal politicians. Family First Party national director, Lyle Shelton was also there.

The Atlas Network has form: it is credited with influencing the election of autocraticand ultra-conservative leaders in Brazil, Argentinathe Netherlands and, recently, New Zealand. Will Australia be next?

This may seem disconnected from matters of church and state, but, as oneAmerican professor of religion says, we need to recognize that Christian dominionism is just “part of the tool kit of political radicalism.”

When Australia moved to recognize Indigenous Australians in our constitution and give them a Voice to Parliament, the Atlas Network set to work here, coordinating the efforts of its Australian think-tanks and setting up Advance Australia to spear-head the “No” Campaign. 

They didn’t have to reinvent the wheel. The Atlas Network had already been successful in effectively sinking a United Nations campaign to ensure greater involvement by Indigenous communities in oil and gas production in Canada.

Both Jacinta Price and Warren Mundine are associates of the Atlas Network-affiliated Centre for Independent Studies. Both also have strong ties to religion. 

Adding to the “toolkit”, during the Voice campaign, it was announced that, under the auspices of Advance Australia, another group, Christians for Equality, had been formed, with our old friend, Lyle Shelton, appointed to head it.  

A triumphant “test-run” for the Atlas Network in Australia, its scare campaign managed to bring support for the Voice down 20 points, resulting in the catastrophic defeat of the referendum. 

What might Atlas achieve at our next Federal election? And to whom will conservative politicians be in debt?

If paleolibertarianism gains a firm foothold here in Australia, their targets will include: voluntary assisted dying, women’s reproductive choice, government welfare, public schools, Medicare, unions, marriage equality, gay rights, anti-discrimination laws, immigration and refugees, the rights of people from non-Christian religions, and more. Jacinta Price has already flagged that transgender people are next on her hit-list.

So many groups are threatened by this movement. Yet, we all tend to fight independently on different fronts. 

This goes beyond a risk to the separation of church and state; Australian democracy is at stake. We need to look at what’s happening in America and start taking dominionism, Christian nationalism and these libertarian think-tanks deadly seriously. 

I think we need to pull together a peak group of organisations, including unions and mainstream churches, to counter this movement. 

Ultra-wealthy benefactors with progressive ideas do exist – and while we don’t want this to become a “Clash of the Titans,” we need substantial funding to devise and implement a strategy to counter this assault on our democracy. 

There’s no point tinkering at the edges. We need professional political strategists and communications experts on board to help craft a “cunning plan.”

And finally, we have to understand that the crazy circus that surrounds this movement is a feature, not a bug. It’s there to distract us, to make us underestimate them, and to keep us fixated on the “useful idiots” in the frontline, while the operatives with the money, power, brains and the international networks pull all the strings. 

Recommended further reading:

Elle Hardy, Beyond Belief: How Pentecostal Christianity is Taking Over the World, Hurst & Company London, 2021 (Thank you to Elle and the publishers for providing me with a complimentary copy of the book.)

Katherine Stewart, The Power Worshippers: Inside the Dangerous World of Religious Nationalism, Bloomsbury Publishing, 2020

Melinda Cooper, Family Values: Between Neoliberalism and the New Social Conservatism, Zone Books, 2019 (I haven’t read this yet, but it’s been recommended by Dr Jeremy Walker)

Jeremy Walker, Silencing the Voice: the fossil-fuelled Atlas Network’s Campaign against Constitutional Recognition of Indigenous Australia, Cosmopolitan Civil Societies, 2023. (This is open source. You can access a PDF or HTML full text version by clicking the links to the left of the abstract.)

Jeremy Walker, Atlas Network’s fossil-fuelled campaign against the Voice, Independent Australia, 10 October 2023

7 thoughts on “Christian Dominionism: Follow the Money

  1. reluctantpollie

    So what could an independent candidate do, to throw some light on this issue in the run up to the next Qld state election, without appearing as a complete fruit loop?

    Reply
    1. thatsmyphilosophy Post author

      Ah! There is the problem! As Lucy Hamilton has written: ““The risk for anyone writing about the beliefs and behaviour of the Pentecostal movement is that the writer, rather than the faith, sounds hysterical.”

      I think shining a light on this issue is important – spreading the word, letting people know about it.

      Someone said that the work we researchers do is important because we provide evidence that becomes “stepping stones” across the swamp. It’s not a conspiracy if you can prove it’s true.

      Please note most of the evidence in my speech comes from Christians and Christian organisations.

      I have been speaking to a friend who is not much interested in politics, but since reading my speech she is starting to notice how trust in institutions is being undermined so that, when the paleolibertarians have their chance, there will be less resistance against privatisation or doing away with them altogether.

      Note the right wing attacks on the Australian Electoral Lobby during the Voice referendum. They want us to lose trust in this institution so radical change will become conceivable. This is called moving the Overton Window.

      Same thing with Lyle undermining the Human Rights Commission, and the attacks on public schools.

      These people are not “conservatives”, they are radicals – revolutionaries – who want to change everything to work for their own narrow interests.

      Reply
      1. Phil Patterson

        “Note the right wing attacks on the Australian Electoral Lobby during the Voice referendum. They want us to lose trust in this institution so radical change will become conceivable. This is called moving the Overton Window.”

        It may seem counterintuitive to some, but one thing that is needed in the face of this is a conservative approach to the question of the institutions of democracy. People refer to right wing politics and politicians as ‘conservative’ but politics on the right – and particularly as regards our political institutions – have been radical for years – certainly since Howard. There is a lot that is wrong with the theoretical substrate of Westminster democracy, but basic concepts like separation of church and state and the need for its maintenance is profoundly important and it is basically a conservative position. I speculate that if these people who argue for the so-called ‘Overton Window’ (note: I haven’t gone on to read about that yet) are met with *conservative* arguments supporting the maintenance of our institutions it might deflate their own strategy to some extent.

        I have been vaguely concerned about this stuff for a number of years – I am sure I’ve read that these jokers have had some success in my own area (Gippsland).

  2. andrew.bush.1@bigpond.com

    6-12-2023.

    Hello Chrys,

    Thank you for your e-mail that I received yesterday. I fall into two categories. I am a Christian and a theologian, though now retired. I’m possibly the most disbelieving, doubting, questioning, radical, skeptical theologian you will ever know. My form of Christianity centres on helping other people responsibly, (i worked in the Church’s counselling, social service and social welfare work, and not much in parish ministry), and this was true of the most disadvantaged; plus I have been a member of the Liberal Party across three states of Australia for almost fifty-nine years. I do admit my concern about a number of charismatic and pentacostal Christians wanting what is called pre-selection within our Party as candidates for Parliament. I am on the left of our Party which means I am mainstream, middle of the road, and moderate. I would like to get and keep ideology out of politics. Politics should be focused on meeting the needs of people and helping and serving people; not using people as pawns in a power game, in my opinion.

    In relation to America I am very anti-Trump. I occasionally privately think to myself that the best thing one could do to Trump would be to shoot him. That thought makes me feel a little guilty, as I am against almost all forms of violence. What is going on, especially in the USA, explains the increasing disunity and antagonism and I would absolutely hate to see the increased alienation, hatred, and prejudice grow here in Australia. It would undo the success of our multi-cultural nation, it would divide us in an increasingly destructive and dangerous manner, it would destroy our sense of unity, and we would all be the poorer for such a societal disintegration. I would hate to see it.

    If I may, I want to distribute your e-mail to me to some others, please. May I have your approval to do this, please?  I also wish to think about the issues and worries that you raise, and what can be done to bring politics and Christianity back to focusing on helping people in a non-judgemental manner, rather than the seeking of power over other people, which, to my mind, is the antithesis of true Christianity and of Jesus teaching.  Obviously, we have a lot to learn, and that includes me.

    At this point, I’m nor sure what an older man and  a somewhat decrepit person can do to help. I am happy to help as much as I am able to. Please count me in as a supporter of your efforts.

    Again, many thanks for your e-mail.

    Andrew D’A. E. Bush.

    On ,Tue Dec 05 2023 20:41:03 GMT+1100 (Australian Eastern Daylight Time), Gladly, the Cross-Eyed Bear < comment-reply@wordpress.com > wrote:

    >

    Reply
    1. thatsmyphilosophy Post author

      Hi Andrew, I’m very happy for you to share the transcript of my speech, providing anything you share includes my name – Chrys Stevenson – and a link to the post online – https://chrysstevenson.com/2023/12/05/christian-dominionism-follow-the-money/

      You receive it as an email below star you subscribe to my blog. Others can just go to the link above.

      Thank you for your comments. This is not anti religion, it’s anti an “imposter religion”.

      Reply
  3. icarmichael

    Just awful stuff. Such a contradiction/negation of the Kingdom of God’s true character.

    Reply
  4. Pingback: ‘The Power Worshippers’ by Katherine Stewart | The Resident Judge of Port Phillip

Leave a comment