Category Archives: Uncategorized

What I Think about Think Inc.

When news about the Think Inc. Convention first appeared in my Twitter stream,  announcing speakers like Christopher Hitchens, Ayaan Hirsi Ali and Neil deGrasse Tyson I remember thinking, “Whoa! Where did this come from?”

Of course, the Global Atheist Convention in 2010 attracted some huge names, but they were booked through the ‘tried and true’ Atheist Alliance International and the Atheist Foundation of Australia. Members of the atheist and sceptical communities were familiar with these groups and were comfortable with them.  But, now, a similar (albeit one-day) convention of ‘Biblical’ proportions seemed to have appeared out of the ether.  Its organisers, it turned out, were a small group of young men virtually unknown to either the atheist or sceptical communities. I couldn’t help but wonder how they’d managed (apparently) to sign some of the biggest stars in the ‘rational’ universe. And I wasn’t alone.

There’s been a bit of scepticism about the Think Inc. event.  I guess that’s almost par for the course when your target market is a bunch of self-identified sceptics.  Was it legit? Would it definitely go ahead?  And how the bloody hell did a bunch of young nobodies manage to snare “The Hitch”?

There was so much ‘chatter’ going on about this event, that I decided to go straight to the source.  In the last week I’ve had two very long telephone conversations with organiser, Sean Kwan. In fact, as someone with previous experience in organising major events,  I’ve given the poor boy quite a grilling.  To Sean’s credit, he’s been happy to answer every question I’ve asked him – even the hard ones and the ones it really wasn’t my business to ask.

Sean explained that, although virtually unknown in our community, he and his business partners have considerable experience in the management of large events – particularly music events.  One of their biggest ventures was Melbourne’s the Jump Off Under 18s Music Festival  in December 2010.  This featured a long list of international artists and drew a crowd of over 4000 people.

So how did Sean and his partners manage to book so many big names from the atheist and sceptical world?  Shockingly simple, really – the same way they book international music acts – through their agents.

One of my hobby-horses is the need to get young, talented, enthusiastic people heading up our communities.  We oldies have a lot to offer, and I’m not suggesting we be pensioned off and consigned to wheel-chairs at the back of the hall just yet. But I’d love to see a younger faces fronting Australian atheism and scepticism. We have such great young talent, and I’d love us oldies to push the young ones into the spotlight and let them shine.  Jason Ball, OJ Lesslar, Jayson Cooke, Andrew Skegg, Kylie Sturgess – all these under 40s (and others) are just fabulous advertisements for reason and essential to attract the next generation of activists for secular and sceptical issues.  I’d love to see our events rock.  So,  I’d like to see we older campaigners take a bit of a risk and trust that the younger generation can do the job.  After chatting with Sean, I felt reassured that he knows what he’s doing and I really felt I’d like to support him.

Sean and his team are all atheists and sceptics.  They (along with their financial backers and sponsors) have taken a huge risk in putting together what looks to be an incredibly exciting event.  Perhaps it’s the type of event that only a young team like this would be game to tackle independently.  What marvellous things we can achieve when we’re young and seemingly bullet-proof!

Honestly, I can’t say whether Think Inc. will be a financial success.  But, Sean has assured me that they have passed the point of no return – contracts have been signed with the venue and all the speakers, deposits and upfront payments have been made so the event is absolutely, definitely, 100% going ahead.

Neil deGrasse Tyson

And, what an event it will be!  Christopher Hitchens, of course, is too ill to travel to Australia but will be appearing by video link-up.  Due to some recent security concerns, Ayaan Hirsi Ali has yet to be 100% confirmed for a live appearance – although everything possible is being done to make this happen.  If not, she will appear by video link.  But, astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson is definitely appearing live and will be heading the line-up along with environmental scientist Tim Flannery and sceptic, Michael Shermer.  The absolutely fabulous Father Bob Maguire and the eminently huggable Josh Thomas are also listed to speak, along with Youtube star, Cristina Rad, and many others.

Tickets are quite reasonably priced for an event in such a great venue (the Melbourne Convention and Exhibition Centre) and with such high profile names.  Day passes are $145 and students can get in for just $115 (plus a small booking fee).  If you’re cashed up and want to mix it with the big names, you can do that too by buying a VIP pass for $300.  This gives you access to some private events with the speakers and guaranteed best seating on the day.

I know that all of us are looking forward eagerly to the second Global Atheist Convention to be held in April 2012,  but this event is slightly different in its focus and offers a great opportunity to see even more of the world’s greatest scientists, sceptics and rational thinkers.  There can never be too much of a good thing – and what the hell else would you do with that hundred odd bucks anyway, huh?

So, bottom line, let’s get behind this event.  I’ve been very impressed with Sean Kwan’s honesty and sincerity and, if he gets our support,  we can look forward to more events of this type in the future.

Sean and his team may be young, but they’re not inexperienced and I’d like to see ‘our team’ give them a go.

The Think Inc. convention will be held on 18 September at the Melbourne Convention and Exhibition Centre.  More details are available at the Think Inc. website.

Chrys Stevenson

Access All Areas

Mum and Dad - godless but good

Australia is one of the world’s least religious countries. Many of us don’t believe in God or a divine power, many more don’t really give it much thought.

Despite this, we’re pretty laid back about those who do believe. I’m reminded of my Dad’s assessment of his new Seventh Day Adventist neighbour: “He’s got some funny ideas, but he’s a good bloke.”  The neighbour soon passed the ‘Dad’ test and was duly dubbed ‘my mate Kev’. Dad wasn’t religious, but he didn’t really care what you believed, as long as you didn’t try to convert him or mess with his kids. Just so, while 92 per cent of Australians don’t bother going to church most Sundays we don’t have any quibble with those who do – at least they’re not waking us up mowing their lawns!

Australians are a tolerant bunch. Sometimes we’re criticized for being so tolerant we’re apathetic. In truth, we just want to get on with our own lives and let others get on with theirs. But we’re not doormats. There’s a point at which the normal, laid-back Aussie puts down the TV remote, gets off the recliner, stands up and shouts, “I’ve had e-bloody-nough of this!” And then the fur starts to fly. That’s what happened when the Access Ministries ‘religion in schools’ scandal, broke.

When it was revealed the organisation which supplies chaplains and scripture teachers to Victorian state schools saw their privileged access to children as a God-given opportunity to recruit disciples for Jesus, all hell broke loose. Indeed, the news was met with the deafening sound of ordinary Australian mums, dads, grandparents, teachers, religious leaders and theologians shouting enough is enough!

There’s been a rising disquiet about the intrusion of fundamentalist religion into Australian politics, education, health and welfare for some time – and not just amongst the atheist fringe. In 2005, academic and theologian, Marion Maddox warned about the growing political influence of those with extremist Christian views in her book, God Under Howard. Her revelations and a change of government in 2007 didn’t stop Kevin Rudd and, now, Julia Gillard pandering to the shrill demands of the same zealous minority for more money, more exemptions, more access and more influence over their fellow Australians’ lives.

The same concerns motivated Warren Bonett to compile The Australian Book of Atheism (Scribe, 2010) to which I contributed last year. Far from being a sustained atheistic rant against religion, the 30 authors, (many whose names will be familiar to the general public), provide what theologian, Peter Kirkwood, described as “Reasonable people politely showing God the door.”

A large proportion of Australians who don’t go to church – and many who do – will be unaware that fundamentalists aspire to reclaim our nation for Christ and create God’s Kingdom here in Terra Australis – with or without your consent. This is what’s known in the US as Christian nationalism – the idea that public institutions should operate according to (the fundamentalist interpretation of) Biblical law. And it’s not just all talk.

According to David Yates, the Australian Christian Lobby launched Compass Australia in 2007 to identify ‘future influencers for Christ in society’, nurture their paths through university and beyond, and help them infiltrate Australian media, education, politics and law. The agenda-driven aim is to exert a ‘disproportionate impact’ for the Gospel on Australian culture and society. Compass, Yates explains, is thinking, “about 15 to 20 years down the track … These fields, to us, are the strategic areas.”

The recruitment starts in schools. But, with religious affiliation and church attendance plummeting, there’s an alarming shortage of potential conscripts. That’s where organisations like Access step in. “There is an enormous amount of Christian ministry going on in our schools,” says CEO Evonne Paddison, “but we must ask how much of that ministry is actually resulting in Christian conversion and discipleship growing and resulting in church growth?”

Ms Paddison is touchingly grateful for the ‘access all areas’ pass her organisation has been given – at taxpayers’ expense.

“In Australia we have a God-given open door to children and young people with the Gospel, our federal and state governments allow us to take the Christian faith into our schools and share it. We need to go and make disciples … I believe that this is the greatest mission field we have in Australia: our children and our students. Our greatest field for disciple making.”

Importantly, the instruction to bring state school children into the fundamentalist fold is directly in breach of Access Ministries’ promise not to proselytise in state schools.  Nor is this just a Victorian issue. In Queensland, Scripture Union provides a similar service under the same kind of restrictions. That doesn’t stop CEO, Tim Mander (potentially Queensland’s next Education Minister), gloating at the captive audience a vote-buying government and an apathetic public have delivered into his lap: “Here is the church’s opportunity to make a connection with the one place through which every young person must attend: our schools.”

My Dad was a typical, laid-back Aussie. He didn’t have much time for religion but he taught us that double-dealing, breaking promises, and taking money under false pretences were wrong. He believed in giving anyone a fair go but he wouldn’t have let us kids within a ‘bulls roar’ of the manipulative missionaries whose strategy to ‘access all areas’ starts in our state schools and ends with our government.

Chrys Stevenson

Chaplaincy Challenge

First, my apologies to my subscribers for the lack of content on this blog over the last couple of months.  I’ve been unwell but I’m back now and firing on all cylinders.

Ron Williams’ High Court Challenge against federal funding for the National School Chaplaincy Program will be heard in Canberra next week.

I’ll be travelling to Canberra with Maria Proctor, President of the Humanist Society of Queensland.  The Queensland Humanists are the major financial backers of the Challenge, having contributed nearly $25,000  towards Ron’s legal costs.

There has been a great deal of misinformation about the issues that will actually be discussed at the High Court.  To bring myself ‘up to speed’ I  spent a week ploughing through all the legal documents (available on the High Court’s website).   My pre-hearing summary was published this week on ABC’s The Drum – and I hope to submit a follow-up article immediately after the hearing.

For those interested in following the case, I’ll be posting a daily update here, and tweeting from @Chrys_Stevenson.  You can also catch updates on my Facebook  page.  I’ll be using the twitter hashtag #HighCourtNSCP.  You may also wish to follow Ron’s official twitter account at @HighCourtNSCP.

If you’re able to join us in Canberra, we’d love to see you – the more support the better. We’re already looking forward to  spending time with Hugh Wilson from the Australian Secular Lobby, Max Wallace (The Purple Economy), Meg Wallace, Andrew Rawlings from the Melbourne Atheists and the indomitable Elida Radig from Victoria’s Progressive Atheists.

The cost of mounting this challenge is enormous and Ron still urgently needs assistance to help cover his legal costs.  Please consider making a donation at the High Court Challenge website.

Chrys Stevenson

Defending the Indefensible: The historical lineage of The Australian Christian Lobby’s Christian ‘values’

This is an article I wrote some weeks ago in response to another outrageous outburst from Jim Wallace of the Australian Christian Lobby.  It got caught up in a queue for publication elsewhere and I subsequently used parts of it to respond to Mr Wallace on Leslie Cannold’s recent article on “Christian Values” on Online Opinion.  I thought it was timely given Mr Wallace’s attack on homosexuals and Muslims today to publish the whole article here.

Update 5 May 2011: Since Wallace’s attack on gay Australians, Victorian MP Geoff Shaw has also revealed the bigotry and extremism of Christian fundamentalism by equating the gay rights with pedophilia and child abuse.  Shaw is a member of the Peninsular City Church (Pentecostal) at Frankston which runs and promotes the Alpha Course which includes significant anti-gay propaganda.  If you read the last link you will see that Shaw’s views mesh exactly with those of the Alpha course teachings.

Around 26AD, so legend has it, a nomadic Jewish preacher defied Jewish law by laying his hand upon a leper. With this simple act, he set an important example of how compassion should override religious tradition, prejudice, fear and self-interest.  I hear a whole religion was built upon the teachings of that nomadic preacher. Sadly, it seems, its adherents remember little of the message he tried to impart. In fact, the Christian church has a very poor record of emulating the man they claim to worship.

Throughout history, those who dared to disagree with the devotees of Jesus of Nazareth have been variously boiled in oil, drowned, dismembered, raped with objects, mutilated, burned, roasted alive, stretched on a rack, massacred with swords and, later, with guns and cannon-fire. The church has never been a great supporter of human rights or social diversity.

In the nineteenth century, when women began agitating for equality and the right to vote, conservative Christians fought them tooth and nail, claiming that women’s subjection to men was founded in ‘natural law’ as handed down by God. Not surprisingly, they quoted Biblical chapter and verse to defend their position.

According to American suffragette, Elizabeth Cady Stanton:

“From the inauguration of the movement for woman’s emancipation the Bible has been used to hold her in the ‘divinely ordained sphere’ prescribed in the Old and New Testaments.

The canon and civil law; church and state; priests and legislators; all political parties and religious denominations have alike taught that woman was made after man, of man, and for man, an inferior being, subject to man.”

While Christians make much of William Wilberforce’s role in ending slavery, less is said about the conservative Christian defence of trading in human misery. In 1823, for example, Richard Furman, a slave holder and leader of the South Carolina Baptist Convention, advised South Carolina’s governor that, “The right of holding slaves is clearly established by the Holy Scriptures, both by precept and example.”

This view was so strongly held that, in 1845, those firmly convinced that slavery was God-ordained formed a separatist group – the Southern Baptist Convention – which survives to this day.  Had the Southern Baptists held the political sway they now hold in the US government, African-Americans may still be totin’ that barge and liftin’ that bail.

In the 1960s, when African-Americans began to fight against their historical oppression and demanded civil rights and an end to segregation, where was the conservative arm of the Christian church? Fighting them every inch of the way.

But surely, not! After all, Martin Luther King was not only a committed Christian but a pastor. So, what was King’s view on the support he received from the church? In 1963, in his “Letter from a Birmingham Jail”, King wrote:

“I have traveled the length and breadth of Alabama, Mississippi and all the other southern states. On sweltering summer days and crisp autumn mornings I have looked at the South’s beautiful churches with their lofty spires pointing heavenward. I have beheld the impressive outlines of her massive religious education buildings. Over and over I have found myself asking: “What kind of people worship here? Who is their God? Where were their voices when the lips of Governor Barnett dripped with words of interposition and nullification? Where were they when Governor Wallace gave a clarion call for defiance and hatred? Where were their voices of support when bruised and weary Negro men and women decided to rise from the dark dungeons of complacency to the bright hills of creative protest?  Yes, these questions are still in my mind. In deep disappointment I have wept over the laxity of the church.”

In Arkansas, a statement signed by eighty ministers explained the Church’s view on integration:

“This statement is not made with any enmity or hatred in our hearts for the Negro race. We have an abiding love for all people . . . [But] [w]e believe that the best interests of all races are served by segregation …We resent the implication by certain liberal ministers that it is un-Christian to oppose integration. We believe that integration is contrary to the will of God … is based on a false theory of the ‘universal fatherhood of God and the universal brotherhood of man.’ We believe that integration is not only un-Christian, but that it violates all sound sociological principles and is not supported by Scripture or by biological facts.”

Wow!  ‘Contrary to the will of God’, ‘un-Christian’, ‘not supported by Scripture or biological facts’.  Doesn’t this all sound eerily familiar?

In February 2011, Jim Wallace of the Australian Christian Lobby defended the right of religious schools to expel gay students for no other reason except for being gay.  He said he had no qualms about the law and that a church school should have the right to expel any openly gay child.  What an interesting distinction is made here; and how curiously reminiscent of segregation.  “Religious schools should be segregated on the basis of sexual orientation, but we might tolerate you if you can ‘pass as straight’.”

Jim, of course, realizes his stance on this might seem a little … well …  un-Christlike, so he quickly adds a proviso:

“But I would expect any church that found itself in that situation to do that in the most loving way that it could for the child and to reduce absolutely any negative affects … I think it’s a loving response.”

Personally, I’m struggling to understand how you can expel a student, just for being who they are, in a ‘loving’ way;  but then, the religious bigots who opposed racial desegregation also professed their ‘abiding love’ for the Negro people (“But please, just keep them out of our schools and churches.”).

Consider this potted history of conservative Christianity’s record on diversity, human dignity, freedom and tolerance as you read Greens are attacking religious freedom, Jim Wallace’s latest tirade against the ‘homosexual lobby’, published in last week’s Australian. Be careful! Your jaw may shatter as it hits the ground in astonishment at Wallace’s revelation that Christians are being oppressed by homosexuals.

According to Wallace, it is not Christians who seek to inhibit diversity and, through legislation, force all Australians to live in accordance with a particular set of moral values, but homosexuals.  It is an argument of such arrogant audacity and heartless hubris that it left me physically ill and shaking with rage.  It reminded me of a particular quote from another vocal supporter of Christian doctrine:

“If, with the help of his Marxist creed, the Jew is victorious over the other peoples of the world, his crown will be the funeral wreath of humanity and this planet will, as it did thousands of years ago, move through the ether devoid of men.

Eternal Nature inexorably avenges the infringement of her commands.

Hence today I believe that I am acting in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator: by defending myself against the Jew, I am fighting for the work of the Lord.”

Adolf Hitler (Mein Kampf)

Yes, just as poor old Hitler had to defend humanity against the oppression of the Jews, Jim has to defend Christians against the oppression of the homosexual lobby – and both invoke God as their witness.

It is a time-honoured strategy of bullies and thugs to blame their victims and cast themselves as the oppressed.  It is ‘Religion 101’ to appeal to ‘natural law’ and the ‘will of the Almighty Creator’ in defending the indefensible.

Wallace and the Australian Christian Lobby have tried very hard to portray themselves as religious moderates.  Wallace protests that the ACL is not seeking an Australian theocracy. No! They don’t want a theocracy, they just want laws based on Christian doctrine or, if this can’t be achieved, exemptions to allow Christians to practice the prejudice and bigotry that decent Australians reject.

I thank Mr Wallace for his opinion piece in the The Australian. I hope it will be widely read. For, within this hateful, petty, disingenuous, irrational and self-serving piece of despicable drivel is revealed the true, black and ugly heart of the Australian Christian Lobby andAustralia’s religious right.

Is it only because I don’t believe in resurrection that I am deafened by the sound of Jesus of Nazareth turning in his grave?

Personally, Jim, I think you and your ilk should be expelled from this nation, unless, of course, you can ‘pass’ as civilised human beings. And I mean that, of course, in the most loving way.

Chrys Stevenson

Post Script

Mr Wallace has said today on Sunrise on Seven that Muslims who seek to place their religion above government are ‘extremists’.  Given this statement, it is worth referring my readers to this 2005 article from ACL watcher, Brian Baxter.

A bunch of theocrats: Brig. Jim Wallace and the Australian Christian Lobby – Bruce Baxter

Readers who find the charge that the Australian Christian Lobby’s ultimate goal is an Australian theocracy difficult to believe may find this instructive:

Interview – David Yates, Compass Australia Co-ordinator D.Y: One of the key things that ACL likes to focus on is areas where it can have a disproportionate impact for the Gospel. So, the area of politics and government, where ACL works in, is one particular field. If you can get through government and policy makers then it can influence laws and it can have a disproportionate effect within the culture. 

Related Posts

For a satirical view of this issue, see “Bullets do not  faze me but please don’t call me names”  by Bob Whidon.

Jane Douglas, an ex-Christian, has written a brilliant and insightful piece on Jim Wallace’s tactic (shown above, and also evident in his defence of his indefensibly offensive ANZAC day tweet) of trying to blame the victim.  I have said, above, this is a time honoured tactic of bullies and thugs.  Jane has first-hand experience with ‘bullies and thugs’ and writes, in part:

“… as someone who has close experience of the lasting effect of sexual abuse on children, I feel I need to make this statement:  I warn my kids about people like Jim Wallace in an effort to abuser-proof them. I tell them that bullies and abusers function by fooling us that it not the person who said or did something wrong who is at fault, but rather the poor sod who made an embarrassing fuss about it. I tell them that this is an evil lie.

Abusers harm us, and then slyly try to make us feel ashamed about saying we were harmed. They trick their victims into feeling bad that they spoke up rather than taking responsibility for their own abusive actions. The irony that no fuss would need to have been made had the abuser not acted inappropriately in the first place seems to evade them.It’s this sort of self-preserving manipulation that makes molested children reluctant to disclose the terrible truth of the abuser’s actions for fear of spoiling everyone’s mood and bringing the wrath of the abuser down on their heads. Not that I’m suggesting Jim Wallace is a child molester, but the game is the same. And it should never go unchallenged.”

Extracted from: jim wallace and the despicable tricks of abusers (and arrogant schmucks) by Jane Douglas, Putting her Oar In blog


ANZAC Day Cheapshot from Religious Extremist

See also follow-up article on the Australian Christian Lobby here:  Defending the Indefensible

No matter how much Brigadier Jim Wallace, CEO of the Australian Christian Lobby, may deny his organization’s theocratic ambitions;  no matter how much money the ACL pays a PR company to ‘position’ it in the market-place as ‘moderate’; the undercurrent of extremism keeps shining through brighter than a 60 watt halo on a plastic statue of the resurrected Christ.

Today, ANZAC Day, Brigadier Wallace has chosen to tweet the following message:

Just hope that as we remember Servicemen and women today we remember the Australia they fought for – wasn’t gay marriage and Islamic!

56 minutes ago via TweetDeck

I’m not even going to dignify this with a comment.  I’ll just let the public speak for itself:

authentistic Jeremy McKenna

@JimWallaceACL What they fought for was freedom from prejudice and persecution. For all Australians! #lestweforget
Brentus
popebrentus Brentus
Oh @JimWallaceACL – you are absolutely pathetic. You make a mockery of the message & love of God & spit in the face of Christ’s sacrifice.
Lesley Dimmock
elldeelosang Lesley Dimmock
@JimWallaceACL Perhaps you need to remember that many gay servicemen and women also fought and died for Australia.
Jason Jordan
jasonjordan Jason Jordan
@JimWallaceACL I think equality and freedom from your kind of low-brow discrimination is what they fought for. Go die in a fire Jimbo.
Not Campbell Newman
Can_do_Campbell Not Campbell Newman

and I’m sorry @JimWallaceACL but being a pompous old windbag is not winning you any friends. Go show some love for your fellow man.
Gavin Miller
gavdanmiller Gavin Miller

Fuck You @JimWallaceACL you ignorant prick – The Australia they fought for was for EVERYONE. That’s what makes our nation great. Turd.
Cameron
SeeArePe Cameron

please, feel free to join us in the 21st century. Or just fuck off and die @JimWallaceACL
Ariane
shonias Ariane
@JimWallaceACL @benpobjie The Aus my grandfather fought for also regarded Aboriginal peoples as fauna. I think we can move on.

@JimWallaceACL You’re a right tool. Turning today into another platform for your bigotry? I don’t think the ANZACs fought for that, either.

purserj10:56am via TweetDeckjohnnycau10:56am via web

@JimWallaceACL You are a dill

janek8510:56am via TweetDeckRT @s_bridges: It’s a well-known fact that the Battle of Fromelles pitted Strayans against the evil forces of Islamic gay marriage. (@JimWallaceACL)
jakobein10:56am via Twitter for iPhoneRT @JaneTribune: So @JimWallaceACL wins cocksnap of the day without even breaking a sweat. Go you good thang!
Greybeard310:56am via TweetDeck@JimWallaceACL What a snide, pathetic, mean-minded little jab. So, not one gay serviceman has ever fought (and died) for Australia?
JBAdel10:56am via Twitter for iPhone@JimWallaceACL Congratulations for tweeting the most offensive thing I’ve read in a while. Don’t use ANZAC day to promote bigotry. Vile.
propinqua10:55am via web@JimWallaceACL Although I think freedom did get a guernsey, yes?
dreadpiratemick10:55am via web@JimWallaceACL There are gay and Muslim soldiers fighting for Australia right now, you prat.
GrogsGamut10:55am via HootSuiteRT @canberrajames: +1 RT @macleanbrendan: Best We Forget about @JimWallaceACL and the Australian Christian Lobby.
mjberryman10:55am via Twitter for Mac@JimWallaceACL Just hope you spare a thought for all the atheists who’ve fought & died so you have the right to spout your bigotry & hatred

RT @elldeelosang: @JimWallaceACL Perhaps you need to remember that many gay servicemen and women also fought and died for Australia.

eithniu10:55am via TweetDeckRT @tiffanyff: no @JimWallaceACL, it wasn’t. They fought for freedom, for everyone no matter their sexuality, race or religion

RT @JacobLeigh: We all laugh at the big turd that is @JimWallaceACL but remember our PM thinks appeasing him is more important than meeting gay families.

TheDestroia10:55am via Mobile WebPlease make sure you tell @JimWallaceACL how atrocious his view is. Truly UnAustralian. Total Bigot
eithniu10:55am via EchofonRT @jasonjordan: Please let @JimWallaceACL know what you think of his extremist views. This is the 1st time I have ever called someone UnAustralian.
Deanrizzetti10:55am via webI’m pretty sure @JimWallaceACL has said made the most offensive statement of the year. ACL should sack him#wallacegate
canberrajames10:55am via HootSuite+1 RT @macleanbrendan: Best We Forget about @JimWallaceACL and the Australian Christian Lobby.
sandraom10:55am via EchofonI can’t bring myself to RT it but people should look at what @jimwallaceACL has to say. an appropriate influence on public policy?

@JimWallaceACL For a Christian, what an incredibly unChristian thing to say 🙂 #racism #discrimination

thepatrick10:54am via Twitter for Mac@JimWallaceACL I hope you remember that they fought for an Australia that wasn’t just defined by you.

@JimWallaceACL u and ur christian faith makes me sick 2 the stomach! Dont tell me what my grandparents fought 4. u dont have a fucking clue

Trisha_Jha10:54am via TweetDeck@JimWallaceACL is a disgusting human being.
eithniu10:54am via web@jimwallaceACL if the Christians in the ACL represent real Christianity you will soon be ex-Managing Dir. ACL
popebrentus10:54am via webThis is the disgusting tweet, FYI. RT @JimWallaceACL we remember the Australia they fought for – wasn’t gay marriage and Islamic!

Pretty sure that the Anzacs didn’t fight for trolling lobby groups with more pwer than they really should have. @jimwallaceacl

Thanks to @JimWallaceACL for reminding us the real meaning of ANZAC day. Forget the human cost of war: hate on fags and muslims #douchecanoe

drunkslag10:52am via Twitter for Mac@macleanbrendan does @jimwallaceacl realise that it was also an Australia with a White Australia policy, stolen generations etc.?

@JimWallaceACL I know what my grandmother fought for because she told me: “To keep that totalitarian bullshit in Europe where it belongs.”

no @JimWallaceACL, it wasn’t. They fought for freedom, for everyone no matter their sexuality, race or religion

_Spock10:52am via Twitter for iPhoneRT @benpobjie: thank god for @JimWallaceACL, who reminds us that even on this most solemn of days we can always make time to spread a bit of bigotry
SeanBMcMahon10:52am via Twitter for iPhone@TheDestroia Holy crap. I had to reread twice. Couldn’t believe you’d retweeted it til I saw your tweet before. Shameful @JimWallaceACL
Drive2WorkWeek10:52am via Twitter for iPhone@JimWallaceACL my family fought since the great war against fanatics and bigots like you. I garantee they didnt fight for you! Religeon?!

RT @elldeelosang: @JimWallaceACL Perhaps you need to remember that many gay servicemen and women also fought and died for Australia.

@JimWallaceACL So you didn’t fight for the constitutionhttp://t.co/EU74LkM nor for freedom http://t.co/fCG6C3F? What a tragedy.

popebrentus10:51am via webP.S. @JimWallaceACL Your entire ‘Christian’ organisation sickens me. You do not speak for me & you never, ever will.
RobLindner8910:51am via Mobile Web@JimWallaceACL You sir, are a cunt. Go fuck yourself.
darkdirk10:50am via Tweetbot for iPhone@JimWallaceACL You really are a fucking arsehole. Jesus said love everyone, dipshit. I guess you preferred the Pharisees
beyondbeeton10:50am via twidroydReally, @JimWallaceACL? My grandfather was shot fighting for freedom, even for bigots like you.
iamjomcmahon10:50am via webRT @amoir: @JimWallaceACL My Gallipoli Grandad didn’t fight for wowserism or for a turd like you to ransack his ghost & imply he was anti-gay & racist
Drive2WorkWeek10:50am via Twitter for iPhone@JimWallaceACL they also didnt fight for the opressive christian views of PC fuckwits like u. BTW God doesnt exist u devisive piece of shit
Can_do_Campbell10:49am via webRT @amoir: @JimWallaceACL My Gallipoli Grandad didn’t fight for wowserism or for a turd like you to ransack his ghost & imply he was anti-gay & racist

@JimWallaceACL What they fought for was freedom from prejudice and persecution. For all Australians! #lestweforget

Oh @JimWallaceACL – you are absolutely pathetic. You make a mockery of the message & love of God & spit in the face of Christ’s sacrifice.
bastardsheep10:47am via TweetDeckRT @koosli: Clearly @JimWallaceACL doesn’t know a thing about the culture of respect btw ANZACs & Turks (ie “Islamics”) at Gallipoli.
elldeelosang10:47am via web@JimWallaceACL Perhaps you need to remember that many gay servicemen and women also fought and died for Australia.

and I’m sorry @JimWallaceACL but being a pompous old windbag is not winning you any friends. Go show some love for your fellow man.

canberrajames10:46am via HootSuite@JimWallaceACL wow. just wow. I didn’t you could be more of an idiot: you proved me wrong.

Fuck You @JimWallaceACL you ignorant prick – The Australia they fought for was for EVERYONE. That’s what makes our nation great. Turd.

SeeArePe10:46am via Echofonplease, feel free to join us in the 21st century. Or just fuck off and die @JimWallaceACL

@_jaytalking unfortunately people like @JimWallaceACL exist.

@JimWallaceACL My father didn’t fight in N Guinea for wowserism or for a turd like you to ransack his ghost & imply he was anti-gay & racist

amoir10:45am via web. @JimWallaceACL Anzac Day: people gave their blood and sanity in those wars so you can be indulgently, hatefully irrelevant.
Can_do_Campbell10:44am via Twitter for iPadits people like you @JimWallaceACL who hijack an event like Anzac Day for your own particular whacko theories, that do damage to religion.

@JimWallaceACL Christians like you give the rest of us a bad name. So much for those silly commandments Jesus gave us – love one another.

GibbotMOL10:44am via web@JimWallaceACL must be looking for his own unique definition of dickwad. I’m sure some nice Muslim man will help him find it.

RT @weezmgk: Unlike bigoted hater @JimWallaceACL, I’m accepting & generous. I would even give him a crowbar to help him get his head out of his ass.

RT @s_bridges: Obviously @JimWallaceACL is a man of God because he loves all of God’s creatures, except for the poofs and the Moooooslems.

RT @erinnish: Wow. @JimWallaceACL So many fought and died so we wouldn’t have to live under fascism. Well done for missing that salient point completely.

Hryelle10:42am via weball the bigots and racists like @JimWallaceACL come out on ANZAC day.

And I would suggest @JimWallaceACL that they didn’t fight for ignorant, bigoted, racist, irrelevant, old men like you.

Trisha_Jha10:39am via Twitter for iPhoneRT @benpobjie: thank god for @JimWallaceACL, who reminds us that even on this most solemn of days we can always make time to spread a bit of bigotry
Can_do_Campbell10:39am via Twitter for iPadCan we pls remind @JimWallaceACL that the diggers didn’t choose who they fought for. They fought for every Australian. Man. Women. Child.
Dawkinsb10:39am via webThese people have influence?MT @JimWallaceACL as we remember Servicemen and women today… they fought for -wasn’t gay marriage and Islamic!

Will the Prime Minister speak out against this?  Will the ACL do the Christian thing and send this homophobic old bigot into early retirement?  Will the Australian Army strip him of any honours for his bigotry towards serving men and women in the ADFS? Don’t hold your breath.

Chrys Stevenson

Post Script

Faced with this onslaught of negative publicity Jim tweeted about an hour later:

“Ok you are right my apologies this was the wrong context to raise these issues. ANZACs mean too much to me to demean this day, not intended.”

Well, of course it was intended!  ANZACS obviously didn’t mean enough to him to stop him from using them to make a cheapshot at homosexuals and Muslim Australians.  Not good enough Jim and the apology is an abysmal fail.

And then, in what is becoming Jim’s typical response to plead ‘victimisation’ when he is the aggressor he says:  he expected people to take “advantage” of his comments on Twitter to “score a point”…

No Jim, it was YOU trying to score points by exploiting dead soldiers and presenting a warped, divisive and bigoted view of what they fought for.   The public just responded to this self-serving assault on our national day of remembrance.  Shame.

And as the day wore on the spin from our friend Jim would have put Warnie to shame.  Now, apparently, Jim is the victim and he was simply ‘misrepresented’.  Keep digging Jim, you’ll soon be in China.

Related Links

I have posted a follow-up article on the historical lineage of the Australian Christian Lobby’s ‘Christian values’ here:  Defending the Indefensible

Jimbo’s bigotry makes the news and blogs:

From 2005 and oldie but a goodie:  A bunch of theocrats: Brig. Jim Wallace and the Australian Christian Lobby – Bruce Baxter

Wallace and ANZAC Day 2011 – Bruce Llama

Jim Wallace and foot in mouth disease strikes the Antipodes on Anzac Day – Loon Pond

Lest we forget – Anzac day’s not for politics – Conscience Vote

Jim Wallace from Australian Christian Lobby causes Anzac Day outrage with anti-gay, anti-Muslim Twitter message – Courier Mail

Rod Swift blog post about Jim Wallace

Prime Minister Gillard, The Australian, Derryn Hinch & Hypocrisy

Well, I don’t get many days like this in my otherwise bucolic life perched on top of a mountain in a crooked little cottage in the Sunshine Coast hinterland.

I was somewhat chuffed this morning to see that my letter to the editor of The Australian regarding this article had been published.  It said:

“I was floored by the breathtaking hypocrisy of Julia Gillard’s assurances to Christian leaders (“Gillard reaches out to churches”, 5/4).

Gillard, an atheist, denies her fellow Australians the right to same-sex marriage and euthanasia because of her commitment to “traditional values” but happily flouts those same “Christian values” by “living in sin” at The Lodge.

It seems our Prime Minister is happy to sell out others’ rights and freedoms to pander to Christian lobbyists, while exercising her own right to live in breach of the “values” she so righteously espouses.

Chrys Stevenson, Qld

So, after that little flurry of excitement, the day settled down to its domestic drudgery and we were just sitting down to lunch when the phone rang.  It was a lovely young lady from 3AW who said Derryn Hinch had read the letter and would I be willing to chat to him on air this evening.

I frantically wondered who I could suggest instead of me, but realized if he wanted to talk about my letter, a substitute ‘me’ probably wasn’t going to get the gig.  So I said breezily, “Sure, happy to chat!” and spent the rest of the afternoon paralysed by fear.  I did wonder briefly whether I should shower, make-up and change out of my tracky-dacks, but decided that might be taking things a little too far for a radio interview.

The phone rang just after 5pm.  Hinch did an ‘editorial piece’ about the article and my letter and then introduced me.  Luckily, as so often happens in these cases, the nerves fell away once I was on air and I just concentrated on the message I wanted to deliver.

I think the interview went pretty well (even if I do say so myself!) and you can listen to it here:

Derryn Hinch interview with Chrys Stevenson on 3AW, 6 April

Hinch was very easy to talk to and it was reassuring that he shared my views, so I knew I wasn’t going to be ambushed!

Chrys Stevenson

Further Reading:

Census – No Religion

 

If freedom of religion is the question, secularism is the answer

Waaaay back in late 2007,  Australian members from Atheist Nexus’ Aussie, Kiwi and South Pacific Atheists formed a working group to compile a report on Freedom of Religion and Belief in the 21st Century for the Australian Human Rights Commission (AHRC).  I was the main researcher and writer for the report which you can read here. (Warning – it’s long!)

This issue was of such public interest that the AHRC received nearly 2000 submissions.  A group of academics was commissioned to produce a meta-analysis and this was due out at the end of 2008.  In fact, it has only just been released. You can read it here. (Warning – it’s long!)

My critique of the AHRC report on Freedom of Religion and Belief in the 21st Century has been published on Online Opinion today.  You can read it here. (Please feel free to make a comment and, if you enjoy the article, click ‘like’!)

Here is a short extract:

Initially scheduled for release at the end of 2008, a meta-analysis of the submissions and nationwide public consultation process has only just been published. Given the wealth and diversity of input, the involvement of some of Australia’s leading academics, and the length of time taken to produce the report, I expected something really ‘meaty’ with some decisive recommendations for action. Instead, by trying to please everyone, the result is a disappointingly shallow and, at times, biased, analysis concluding in a number of rather vague and half-hearted recommendations.

I certainly appreciate the difficulty of providing a satisfying synthesis of so many diverse opinions over a very broad range of subjects, but the report prepared by Professor Gary Bouma, Professor Desmond Cahill, Dr Hass Dellal and Athalia Zwartz just seems … well … wishy-washy. After reading nearly 2000 submissions and three years of careful consideration the main conclusions drawn from the research are – ta-dah! – that ‘there is a need to develop appropriate responses to the unique and varied Australian religious contexts and settings’ and that better education about Australia’s diverse religions will help to reduce ignorance and fear. Really? That’s it? …..

Chrys Stevenson

 

Religious Discrimination in State Primary Schools

From the Humanist Society of Victoria …

There are children in our primary schools today who suffer from religious dis­crimi­nation. When religious instruction (or ‘RI’) comes up and parents exert their right of conscientious objection, there can be unintended conse­quences. Separation from their classmates during the RI period is handled like punishment in some schools, and sometimes it is compoun­ded with victimization by other students. And the whole school is affected if a minority is singled out and excluded.

The Humanist Society of Victoria has collected many complaints from the public about the way RI (which is more commonly known as CRE) is being conducted. It has prepared a formal complaint on behalf of the aggrieved parents to the Victorian Equal Opportunity & Human Rights Commission.

The Society has written to State primary school councils, to inform them of the risk of adverse discrimination and to suggest ways of preventing it. Councils were reminded of the wide-spread misconception that schools were required by law to provide RI where it was available. On the contrary, councils are responsible for deciding whether RI is appropriate for their school. We recommend two alternatives: (1) the Humanist course of practical ethics, which is comparable to the

From Golding, The Age

St. James Ethics Centre’s course in NSW; and (2) philosophical ethics taught by professional teachers, trained by Victorian Association for Philosophy in Schools.

RI is a problem also because it is delivered by volunteer instructors from outside the school, not by trained teachers. The system is poorly regulated and not clearly answerable to either schools or parents. Humanists contend that it is an imposition on impressionable children and lags way behind community attitudes and the needs of families in today’s multicultural society.

Concerned parents are encouraged to ask their school (1) to make RI participation a matter of opting-in, not opting-out, and (2) to schedule the RI class after normal school hours. Parents who wish to follow or join the forthcoming legal case can visit the Victorian Humanists’ website and write to the E-mail address, Religionsinschool@gmail.com.

Stephen Stuart, president

Update from Dan Kerr of the Victorian Humanists: Hey Chrys, well we have received so much traffic on the Victorian Humanists website that the servers could not cope. Please pass on this great news (it shows how much support we have) and please direct your readers to www.religionsinschool.com where they can sign up to a newsletter to be updated. And they can email us at religionsinschool@gmail.com

Website:  Religions in School

ABC News Report: Schools ‘discriminating’ against kids who opt out of religion

The Age: Backlash as God forced into schools

Note from Chrys: This is not just a Victorian problem.  Issues with religious instruction are being raised by concerned parents across Australia.  See, for instance, my blog posts on  Religious Conversion by Stealth in NSW Schools and NSW Ethics Classes vs Scripture Classes:  If Your Product’s a Dud, Jim, Don’t Blame the Competition.

If you are a parent with specific concerns about the teaching of RI/CRE/SRE in your children’s school, please contact:

Victoria –  Religionsinschool@gmail.com (Victorian Humanists)

Other States – asl@australiansecularlobby.com (Australian Secular Lobby)

Both of these organisations are well equipped to provide you with advice, information and assistance.

Chrys Stevenson

Feminism: Flogging a Dead Horse? An Insider’s View

A now disgraced and marginalised misogynistic male blogger whose tacky blog I will no longer dignify with a link*, suggests it’s ‘somewhat unfair to keep flogging the dead horse that there is some kind of institutionalized female oppression’.  He was referring, specifically, to the governor-general’s call for a quota to address the woeful ratio of women to men on Australian company boards.  He points to the many Australian women in leadership positions in our government and corporations, the wealth of female talent writing serious stories for our newspapers, and to women driving monster trucks on mining sites as evidence that most of the obstacles to women’s promotion are no longer in place.

Ironically, I  have some sympathy with his position.  I’m not a fan of quotas or affirmative action.  I’m probably one of those women he mentions who, if you suggested they should be appointed because of a quota system, they’d scratch your eyes out.

I’ve always felt it was a woman’s responsibility to fight her own battles in the workplace – no matter how bloody.  As a young woman in corporate Australia in the 1980s and 90s, seeking career advancement was akin to going to war; you needed a well-thought out strategy, the cunning of a fox and the hide of a rhinoceros to succeed.  But, as the male blogger says, it was possible and those who had what it takes to storm the male bastion (Julia Gillard, Anna Bligh, Gail Kelly etc.) are shining examples that women can succeed on their own merits.

On the other hand, only eight per cent of the directors on Australian company boards are women.  Come on!  In 2011 less than one in ten company directors are women?  That’s just shameful – and it’s pretty clear that it’s an institutional problem, rather than a lack of talented women that’s caused the imbalance.  After all, as he says, there’s Julia Gillard, Anna Bligh, Gail Kelly, etc – all shining examples that there’s no shortage of intelligent, educated, career-oriented women.

So, what’s the problem?  There doesn’t seem to be any overt discrimination against women in business, the glass ceiling has been broken, so why so few women in the boardroom?

I can only speculate based on my own experience but, as people on boards tend to be in their 40s, 50s and 60s, it’s probably fair to assume that my experience isn’t unique among women of this age group.  It’s true that I’ve been out of the corporate world for many, many years and it’s entirely possible things have changed.  But, based on the glaring inequity of those public board figures, I’m guessing things haven’t changed as much as they should.

I really can’t blame him for failing to understand what it’s like to be a woman in the workplace. Perhaps expecting a man to know what it’s like to be a woman in business is like expecting a straight person to know what it’s like to be gay.  In no way am I suggesting the level of discrimination is the same.  Only that, in both cases, you can relate the stories of discrimination, abuse and humiliation, but you can’t make someone who hasn’t experienced it know how it felt.

And, sometimes, there are people like him who don’t even ‘get’ that there’s a problem.  They see the end result of women succeeding as proof that the dark days of sexism are behind us – but they don’t see what those women have endured to get there. What I’d like to argue here is that success is not evidence of a lack of discrimination, nor are the removals of official barriers to female promotion.  Further, I’d like to suggest that the lack of female company directors might even reflect the number of  talented and ambitious women who’ve just silently dropped out of the executive talent pool – battle worn and weary.  Maybe it’s because what a woman has to go through to get to the top usually means that the last man standing is usually a man.

The problem is, the discrimination isn’t explicit, it’s insidious and quietly executed.  You wouldn’t know about most of the discrimination unless you were a woman – and even then, you often don’t find out what’s been holding you back.

He also mentions the problem of women’s contempt for other women in the workplace, and I’d like to address that too.  It was certainly something I experienced as a young, ambitious career woman.

In order to illustrate the kind of obstacles women face (or at least used to face) in the workplace, I’d like to share some personal reminiscenses of my own.  As I said, perhaps things have changed, perhaps not.  I apologise in advance for this being very long, but it’s time I told this story.  It needs telling.

Learning the Ropes

Very early in my career I learned that I had to stand up for myself in the workplace.  I was only twenty when my boss pinned me against the wall of the photocopying room with hopes of a quick grope.  I said, “Take one step closer and I will bring my knee up so hard your balls will be black and blue for a month.  Not only that, but I will ring your wife and tell her why I am sending you home with bruised balls.”

He backed off saying, “Oh, it’s like that, is it?”

“Yes, it’s like that.”

“OK, then.  Glad we understand each other.”

I never had another problem with sexual harassment.

For the first six months or so I worked in that job doing almost all of the office administration – while being paid as a secretary.  At length, the boss decided we needed an office manager.  I came in one Monday morning to find he’d hired one of his mates.  The man was clueless.  He  knew nothing about the business we were in or about being an office manager.

“He needed the job,” was the best excuse the boss could make for this monumentally bad management decision.

I continued to do most of the work.  When I complained, the boss had the grace to agree he should have promoted me (but it hadn’t occurred to him).  He gave me a ten percent pay rise – but also increased my responsibilities.  So, I did the admin manager’s job while earning half his salary, while he did very little on twice my income.  I was learning about how it was in business for women.

I Can Do That!

A few jobs later, I was starting to realize I was just as smart as many of the men I was working for. With a bit of training, Ithought, I could easily do their jobs.  In fact, in some cases, I was doing their jobs!  So, I took myself off to TAFE (business school) and did some sales and marketing courses to prove I was serious about promotion.

News that one of the secretaries had ambitions-above-her-station were soon flying around the office.  One day, one of the female accounts staff cornered me at the photocopier.  What is it about offices and photocopiers???

“I hear you’re doing business studies at TAFE,” she sneered.

“Yes, I am.”

“I don’t know why you bother,” she sighed.

“Well, I work in marketing, I’m interested in knowing more about it, and maybe, one day, I’ll be a marketing manager instead of a secretary.”

“You’re wasting your time,” she spat – and I can still hear the venom in her voice.  “You’ll soon get married, have kids, leave work and all that study will be wasted.  You’re just making yourself look silly.  Everyone in the office is laughing at you.”

I soon discovered they were laughing for good reason.

In an attempt to use my new marketing knowledge and ‘get noticed’by management,  I wrote a feature article on my company for a major trade journal.  My boss and the general-manager were delighted when publication of a two-page spread with photos was approved by the editor.  After work, one evening, when only the general manager and I were still in the building, he approached my desk:

“Chrys!  Just wanted to say what a great job you did on that article!”

“Thank you, Mr S!”

“But, I want to talk to you about one little thing.  As you know, this is a male-dominated industry. I’ve given it a lot of thought and I think your article will have more impact if it looks like it’s written by a man.  So,” he said with an avuncular pat on my shoulder, “I’m sure you won’t mind that I’ve rung the editor and had him put my name on it.  You understand, of course!  And, Chrys, we’ll keep this between us, eh?  Head office doesn’t need to know.”

“Of course, I understand, Mr S.  Thank you for letting me know.”

I went home and started looking for a new job.

Climbing the Corporate Ladder

The new job was as personal secretary to a CEO in an international company in the finance sector.  It was a very prestigious position in a very posh office.  I was taking over from the CEO’s previous secretary who’d been promoted into management (a good sign, I thought).

On my first day, I was called into the CEOs office for an hour of very fast shorthand.  I was told it needed to be transcribed and on his desk by lunch time.  I’d been honest in my interview by disclosing that my shorthand was rusty, but this was ignored.  I managed to get down a book full of shorthand at 120 words per minute.  I had no clue whether I could transcribe it.  But there were worse problems awaiting me.

When I sat down at my desk and looked for a typewriter, there wasn’t one.  I asked my female mentor (the CEO’s previous secretary) where my typewriter was.

“There isn’t one,” she said.  “We work on computers.  There’s yours.”

“But, I’ve never used a computer!” I said.

“Learn!” she replied.

“But,” said I, tears stinging at my eyes, “I have all this shorthand, and it has to be transcribed and on his desk by lunch time.  What happens if I can’t work out how to use it?”

“You’ll get fired, I guess,” she sneered and sauntered off.

I fired up the computer, worked out how to use it and had the documents on his desk by noon.  I still don’t know how I managed it.

Shortly after, my female nemesis flounced into the CEO’s office without bothering to check in with me, or even knock on his door.  I heard the click of the lock and then I heard them giggling together as she recounted my discomfort.  It turned out that ‘lunches’ behind locked doors were part of the daily routine for the CEO and his former secretary.  I determined that if I was going to be promoted, it wouldn’t be while I was lying on my back on the office sofa with my legs in the air.

Some weeks later, the boss asked me to bring in coffee for some visiting business executives.  I happened to enter the office at the same time as the (male) sales manager.

“Gentlemen!” said the boss – all ‘hail fellow well-met’.

“Meet Jim Jenkins.  Jim’s our sales manager and a very valuable member of our staff!”  There were handshakes all round as I stood back quietly, still holding the tray of coffee.

Then the boss spotted me.  “And this is … well, she’s the bird who brings the coffee! You don’t need to know her name!” he said with a great belly laugh.  (I might add that as well as making a mean cup of coffee, I had, that week, worked out how to use macros in Excel and designed a program for calculating hire purchase payments that saved the salesmen hours of time doing manual calculations.)

After the visitors left I stormed into the CEO’s office and said, “Don’t you ever do that to me again.”

“What?” he said.

But he knew what he’d done and he did apologise.  In fact, he admired my spunk in standing up for myself.  But many, many women in their early twenties wouldn’t have risked a prestigious, well-paying job to stand on principle – and who can blame them.  Even then, I knew I was in the minority.

I kept studying at night and began submitting marketing plans to my ‘other’ boss, the sales manager, Jim Jenkins (names have been changed to protect the despicable).  I soon found out that my marketing plans were being photocopied (that damn photocopier again!) with my name tippexed out and sent on to head office under his name.  When I confronted him he looked sheepish but he was unapologetic.

“Look, they’re good ideas, but nobody’s going to accept them from a woman.  I’m just making sure they get picked up.  What’s important is that I know they came from you …”

The implication was that if I was a good girl and kept quiet, eventually I’d be promoted into management.

And, sure enough, one day, the CEO called me in to his office.

“We get the feeling you want to be in management.”

“Yes.”

“So, we’ve decided we’re going to give you a chance.  But, first you have to learn the business properly.  I’m demoting you.  You’ll move down to the third floor.  You’ll work as a clerk. Nobody is to know you’re on a management-track.  If you tell anyone, you’ll remain a clerk.  If you do well, we’ll move you up.”

It was mortifying.  Everyone in the office thought I’d done something terrible to be demoted from being the CEO’s glamorous PA to a third-floor filing clerk. I hasten to add that this wasn’t how the men in the office were promoted.   But, this was my big chance, so I kept my mouth shut, did my job, studied all the office manuals and, gradually, worked my way back up to the top floor.  But there was no management position forthcoming.  The department I ended up in was headed by a female manager, and it wasn’t doing well.  There was talk of closing it down.  The female manager had another portfolio so her job was safe, but it would mean I’d probably lose my job, along with several others. Sensing my months in the filing department going to waste,  I devised a plan to save the project and presented it to the CEO and sales manager.

“Put me in charge of the department and I’ll bring in a million dollars a month,” I promised.

They examined my detailed proposal and agreed to put me on a three-month trial.  They said I would be the department ‘supervisor’.  Supervisor?  Really?  All the other departments had managers.  I demanded that I be called a manager.  They agreed, reluctantly, but said there would be no pay rise until after the three-month trial.

The promotion didn’t go over well with the other women in the office.  One night, after work, I was invited to join a few of them for drinks.  It was an ambush.  I was asked what my long-term ambitions were.  By this time, I was in love and thinking about marriage and a family.  I said I hoped to do well in my career, but, ultimately I hoped to get married and stay home with my children – at least until they were at primary school.  Now I was told I wasn’t serious about my job, I was a disgrace to the sisterhood, I was just taking up a position that someone with real ambition might have had.  I was called selfish and pathetic.  One of the women, (now a senior lecturer in business studies at a well-known university), said (and this still makes me cry, even now)!

“You know what’s wrong with you, Chrys?  You’re just an awful person.”

The others nodded in agreement.

I was being undermined elsewhere, too.  My secretary usually took lunch from 12-1. I took mine from 1-2 so there was always someone manning (or womanning) the phones.  One day, when she wasn’t back at 1.15pm I was mildly annoyed.  When she wasn’t back by 1.30pm I was getting angry.  By 2pm I was worried.  By 3pm I was just getting ready to ring the local hospitals when she strolled back into the office.  She explained she’d run into the sales manager at a nearby restaurant and he’d invited her to join his table.  When 1 o’clock came and she told him she had to get back to the office so I could go to lunch, he said, “Stay.”

When she insisted on leaving, saying that I’d be cross if she wasn’t back on time, he said, “Sit down.  That’s an order. You work for me, not her.”

I wasn’t mad at her, but I was furious with him.  So furious, I was shaking.  I picked up my handbag andbriefcase and said, “When he gets back, you  tell him I’ve gone home.  And you can tell him he’s damned lucky he’s so late, because if he’d come back while I was still here I would have bloody decked him!”

Later, I found the CEO had also found a creative way to both undermine me and rouse up the sales team.  It turns out the all-but-one male sales team were told if they didn’t pull their socks up, he’d transfer them into my department.

I’m told sales meetings routinely included the taunt, “Watch out or you’ll be working for a woman!” How very droll.

The irony was that the success of my department relied heavily on information from the field, supplied by the salesmen.  That dried up overnight as the salesmen decided to ‘starve me out’ of my position, lest they should end up working for me.

When I confronted the boss about it I was told with a chuckle it was part of my apprenticeship.  I was being ‘tested’ to show that I had the character required to be in management.  In other words, “Don’t start whining like a feminist or you’ll be out on your ear.”

Proving your worth, it seems, was more important than making money for the company.

For three months my department consistently brought in an additional $1 million in business for the company (a lot of money back then).  At the end of my trial period, I fronted up to the sales manager and asked to be put on a management salary.

“Awww, sorry about that.  Budget’s all taken up for this year.  Maybe next year we can talk about it.”

I went home and looked for another job.

You’re the Manager????

Battered and bruised, I chose the next job specifically because it wasn’t in management.  I’d had enough.  I wanted something with no responsibility, no more fighting, and no more humiliation.  I loved working as a sales rep for an international tourism-related group, but within six months I was reluctantly promoted to the job of state manager.

The reactions of male customers were interesting to say the least.  Many insisted on calling me the ‘manageress’ which I found incredibly insulting. A typical response came from a man who approached me at a trade show. He wanted to know more information about our corporate discount scheme.  I was thoroughly acquainted with it, having sold it as a rep, and I explained how it would work for his company.  As I spoke, I could see him growing increasingly uncomfortable.

“Is there something wrong?” I asked, thinking the poor man may be having a stroke.

“Yes,” he said, “I’d really rather speak to your manager about this.”

“I am the manager,” I replied, “But if you’d like to speak to someone else, you can speak to one of our other staff here – this is my secretary and this is one of my sales staff.”

“You’re the manager?” he said.  (Given the strength of the reaction, I might just as well have told him I was an alien reptile in humanoid form, sent to devour him for lunch and take over the planet by dinner time.)

“Yes, I’m the manager.”

“Oh yes, I see!” he said, recouping his senses, “You’re ‘A’ manager, but I didn’t mean the office manager, dear, I meant the real manager.”

“Oh!” I said, “The real manager.  You mean the state manager?”

“Yes!”  he said, looking relieved and handing me his business card.  “Perhaps you can get him to call me?”

“Well,” I said, “I’d be happy to have the state manager call you, sir, but I don’t think that’s going to satisfy you either.”

“Why not?”

“Because, sir, I’m the state manager.”

“What?” he said, his eyes bulging in disbelief, “of the whole state?”

“Yes, sir, I’m afraid so – more than the whole state in fact.  My area of responsibility extends from Coff’s Harbour to Port Douglas and west to Roma.”

He gave me a look of utter contempt and stormed off.

Despite this kind of opposition I did a great job in this role and I have the many letters of praise from the general manager and the chairman of the board to prove it– including a hand-written note from the chairman saying, “Superwoman lives!”

So, my confidence renewed, when the position of national marketing manager became vacant, I decided to apply.  I’d just organized a very large, successful, international convention for the company so I took the opportunity to present my application to the general manager at the end of the convention.  He thanked me and put it into his briefcase.  I waited, and waited, and waited and heard nothing.

At length, I rang and asked him if he’d had the opportunity to consider my application and whether he’d put it to the board (some of whom had asked me to apply for the position).  He said, “Oh, that’s right, you gave me an application, didn’t you?  I forgot all about that.  Too late now, I’m afraid, I’ve just appointed someone else.”

The ‘someone’ was a male (of course) with no experience in our industry. He proved an absolute disaster.  I think I counted fourteen good people who left the company because of him, and learned that the same thing had happened in his previous job. Several months of antipathy between us (had someone told him I was after his job?) ended in a phone calling from the general manager saying, “I’m sending Robert up to Brisbane to sort things out with you.”

In anticipation of what was to follow, I spent the evening clearing out my office.

Robert arrived in my office the next day saying, “The GM says either we sort this out between us, or you’ll have to leave.”

I said, “You have no intention of sorting this out, do you?”

He smirked.  “No.”

I said, “I thought not.  I’ve already packed my things.  Can you help me carry them down to my car?”

And that was it.  Best job I’d ever had – gone.  I heard later that he died.  I felt like Morales in A Chorus Line –

“Six months later I heard that Karp had died.
And I dug right down to the bottom of my soul…
And cried.
‘Cause I felt… nothing.”

The Joke (1)

I moved on to a job as a marketing manager in a subsidiary branch of a major Australian corporation.  Within days it was clear to me that sales were abysmal because the product was inferior.  Doing my job, I argued that even though supplying a better quality product would cost more, the market would stand a small increase and there would be offsets in substantially more sales.  The suggestion was met with a bemused chuckle from the boss.

“You don’t really understand this business yet,” he told me dismissively in a thick, German accent.  “The product is fine.  Just do your job.  Let me worry about the product.”

But my job was about the product, so I kept pushing and he became increasingly more hostile.  The situation denigrated to screaming matches in his office (him screaming, me standing firm, but trying to calm him down.)  Finally, there was a confrontation in front of the general manager.

I explained, “I’m just trying to do what’s right for the company.  People just aren’t going to buy this product – it’s not value for money.  Give me a better product, increase the price by twenty per cent and I’ll sell it. Just give me a chance.  But, please, stop this guy screaming at me in the office.”

The boss said, “Rolf, are you prepared to stop screaming at Chrys?”

“No, I’m not,” he said, “I’m German.  I scream at people.  That’s what I do.”

“Well then,” said the general manager, “there you have it, Chrys, I guess you’re going to have to put up with it or leave.”

I’d just won them a $2 million a year contract, but I left.

I later found out the reason why the product couldn’t be improved. Apparently, there was a cozy arrangement between middle management and the supplier of the raw materials.   This provided a nice little kick-back for ‘the boys’.  As a woman, of course, I hadn’t been privy to ‘the joke’ – although it turned out all the men in the organization knew about it.

An ‘Interim’ Joke

A friend’s husband offered me a job as manager of a travel company he was negotiating to buy. I was offered an impressive salary, a company car of my choosing and extensive international travel. Instead, as negotiations for the purchase of the company dragged on and I insisted I couldn’t wait interminably to be employed, they ‘found me a place’ in their existing business. Here, I essentially found myself doing menial secretarial work, driving a 20 year old car that had been through the Charleville floods, and having to beg each fortnight for the measly retainer they’d given me until the ‘big job’ came through (it never did).

At meetings, it was assumed that *I* would take the minutes. At one meeting, despite the rest of the staff having been told clearly that I was one of the senior management team, one of the male sales reps asked the boss, “Can you get your girl to get us some coffee?”

A death stare from me prompted a blushing boss to mumble, “Ummm, Chrys doesn’t *do* coffee.”

The Joke (2)

I was shut out of ‘the joke’ at my next job, too.  This manufacturing company was losing $4 million a year in Queensland and my job as the premium brand manager was, ostensibly, to fix it.  It soon became apparent they hadn’t hired a woman to fix it – they hired a woman because they thought a woman couldn’t fix it. I was a huge disappointment.

Despite the inhibition of having ovaries, it didn’t take long to realize two important problems.  First, products, quite sensibly, were costed assuming they would be built once.  But, in actuality, the production management was so abysmal, and retail staff so poorly trained, products were routinely being sent back to the factory for two or more remakes.  This meant we were often selling to our retailers at less than cost.

Secondly, our largest retailer was not only buying from us at less than cost, he was taking 90 days to settle his accounts, and his staff were responsible for many of our remakes (for which they were not being charged).  Further, while ‘Mr Best Customer’s’ business accounted for around fifty per cent of our sales, his staff took up around eighty per cent of my staff’s time.  The solution was simple – sort out the factory, build a margin into the costings for remakes, charge the retailer for remakes arising  their errors, insist on payments within thirty days and invoke penalties for late payments.  I remember standing up at a management meeting and explaining in minute detail how, under the current situation, the more products we sold, the more money we lost.

My suggestions were met with horror.  The production manager insisted that the remake problem could be fixed with a new $1 million computer system. I insisted that teaching reps to use a measuring tape would be a much cheaper fix.  The head office was aghast that I’d suggest ‘heavying’ our best customer to pay more for his products and to pay us on time.  They didn’t want to know that pandering to this rather aggressive member of Queensland’s ‘white shoe brigade’ was largely responsible for the $4 million annual loss.  I was told to ‘back off’.  I even had an after hours visit from Mr Best Customer who sat in my office and recited to me, chapter and verse, what I would and wouldn’t do in my new position.

“I have a relationship with this company, lady, and you need to understand that,” I was told.

“Your predecessor and I had a good relationship.  She understood how important my company is to your business and she did as she was told.”

I explained to Mr Best Customer that I was the manager of this division of the company and as long as I was sitting on this side of the desk, I’d be the one making the decisions, not him.

I later found out my predecessor had been sleeping with Mr Best Customer in the nice little inner-city unit he supplied for her.  Funny, he didn’t extend the same offer to me.  Perhaps he thought my teeth were too big.

A new general manager had been appointed at the same time as me.  He was a nice bloke and he was also trying, unsuccessfully, to get the company back on track.  We both met with opposition all the way.  It seems that neither of us were in on ‘the joke’.  I suspect the operation was never intended to make money.  I suspect it operated at a loss for tax purposes and that we were brought in as the pigeon pair (or should that be the pair of pigeons) most unlikely to solve the problem or uncover the truth.  In the end, we were both called into the board-room and retrenched on the same day.  I was given a cheque for $15,000 and was told I looked remarkably happy for someone who was being fired.  I went home and had a bottle of champagne – glad to be out of it.  The general manager went home and blew his brains out. He was married with two teenage daughters.

Viva the Sisterhood

At my next job I had a female boss in Sydney, but reported to a local (female) chairperson.  It was a nightmare.  After several months in the job, I attended the management meeting in Sydney.  After a ‘getting to know you session’ with the other managers, we were asked to fill out confidential forms about how sales could be improved.  As this was confidential, we were asked to be brutally honest with our observations.

I filled out my form, noting that some of the other managers didn’t seem to have much sales or management experience and that, perhaps, more training may be called for.  I was appalled when the female general manager (a well-known ‘management expert’ and motivational speaker) published the comments with my name appended to them – bringing the wrath of all my co-workers down upon my head.

To further put me in my place, when it came time to hand out the bonus cheques, she did so publicly.

“And, Susie, you’ve done a great job this year.  Here’s $500 for you!”

“Michael, you’ve had a significant improvement over last year.  We’re so thrilled to give you a cheque for $200!”

And Chrys, you haven’t been with us long, but we didn’t want you to miss out, so here’s something for you.

I opened my envelope to find a $2 scratchie. The public humiliation made all the worse for it being intentional.

At the end of my second year in the job, the stress of working with a harridan of a general manager and a shrew of a local chairperson had brought me almost to the edge of a nervous breakdown.  There was a big end of year event planned and I rang my female boss, explained I was unwell, and asked for one of the Sydney staff to fly up to provide some assistance.  I was told, bluntly, “No.”

The chairperson, (a corporate ‘fairy’ who makes a living writing and lecturing with fluttering eye-lashes and a ‘little-girl’ breathy voice about how  love and light and other new-agey things can bring sparkle to your business) was similarly unhelpful.  I staged a successful event, while having a full-scale nervous breakdown,  with no help or sympathy from ‘the sisterhood’.  I paid my brother to give me the assistance I needed and buried it in the costs.

When it was over, I quit.

The Flogged Horse Lays Down and Dies

I was so over it all.  I was sick of being opposed at every turn by both men and women.  I was sick of being seen as a threat.  I was appalled at having to spend eighty per cent of my time politicking in order to keep my job instead of giving my full attention to making money for the companies I represented and their shareholders.  I was sick of listening to lies. I was sick of being told to tell lies.  I was sick of being set up as the office patsy.  I was sick of having to do my job three times better than the men in the office – and then having them promoted over me.

None of the discrimination was ‘overt’.  If anyone had seen me in those days I would have seemed like the poster girl for female corporate success.  Sure, I made it into management and for a while there I earned very good money.  But it was at the cost of being insidiously undermined, having my work used to fulfill others’ ambitions, and being constantly bewildered as the ‘boys’ network’ made sure I was starved of vital information. Ultimately, it destroyed my health and confidence so badly I was unable to work full-time again.

The sisterhood was never there for me.  I was seen as a threat or a bitch by other women whose sole purpose in life often seemed to be either to pull me back down to their level or cut through the rungs of the ladder  above me so that any attempt I might make to reach their level would result in me breaking my neck.

I finally ran up the white flag.  Tired, sick and horrified at the person I had had to become to keep a job in the corporate world I left it behind.

Sure, it’s just my experience.  Maybe women have it better these days.  But, gentlemen, don’t think for a minute that because women have broken the glass ceiling they managed to do it without getting ripped to shreds as they moved through that pane of shattered glazing.  Achievement at the cost of your health and self-esteem isn’t equality – it’s masochism.

I decided I couldn’t be a masochist any longer and still live. It was that serious. I expect many other talented, ambitious women have felt the same.  Maybe that’s why women like me didn’t go on to fill positions on corporate boards.  It doesn’t look like discrimination when a woman finally gives up.  Perhaps that’s why men like you are so perplexed when women still complain about their lot in life, while they see no evidence of discrimination.

Perhaps it’s just that too many mares have been flogged to death on their ascent up the corporate ladder, and our corpses are buried well away from the boardrooms of corporate Australia.

Chrys Stevenson

*The original version of this post referenced ‘the male blogger’ and his website. Since then, his misogyny has become so rampant, so crass and so distasteful  that I will not provide him with any oxygen here on my blog. Accordingly I have expunged his name from this post and from the comments.

Fashion Faux Pas and Literary Lunacies – How Dawkins and Harris overhauled my Intellectual Wardrobe

Back in the 70s, while I was proudly strutting around Brisbane in Pucci print hotpants, a white vinyl wet-look jacket, lace-up boots and purple hair (compliments of Magic Silver White) a quick reconnoitre in my fringed and beaded shoulder bag would almost certainly have yielded a copy of  Lobsang Rampa’s I Believe,  Erich Von Daniken’s Chariots of the Gods,  Stan Deyo’s The Cosmic Conspiracy, Linda Goodman’s Sun Signs, Charles Berlitz’ The Bermuda Triangle or John Fowles’, The Magus.

If you’d peered into a window of our house, you might have found Mum and me, studiously asking questions of our ouija board, or caught us popping out for an evening at the South Brisbane spiritualist church.

By the early 80s, I was sporting the high-necked, lace-trimmed blouses popularised by Lady Diana and the Sloane Rangers.  If you’d searched my handbag then, you would probably have found something by Shirley MacLaine, Betty and Barney Hill’s The Interrupted Journey, Robert A Monroe’s Journeys Out of the Body or Charles Berlitz’s The Roswell Incident.

In the late 80s, I was power-dressing in six-inch stilettos and fluorescent-hued suits with enormous shoulder-pads.  During my lunch-break you’d find me reading  Communion by ‘alien abductee’, Whitley Streiber,  Nostradamus, Many Lives, Many Masters by Brian L Weiss or a book on how to develop your psychic abilities.

It’s important to view these literary pre-occupations of mine in context.  In the 70s and 80s these were the kind of books that thinking people read.  Scientific types might have rejected them, but remember that the paranormal was then considered a legitimate subject for study in some reputable universities and in government departments.  Remember also, that most of us (not even the smart ones) had been to university and had no training whatsoever in critical thinking.

People who read and believed this stuff weren’t counter-cultural.  We saw ourselves as keeping up with the ‘cutting edge’ of scientific discoveries.  We believed the study of near death experiences might soon reveal scientific evidence of an afterlife, that scientists really couldn’t explain how Uri Geller could bend spoons and start watches, and that aliens really might walk among us.  These were serious topics of conversation, discussed over meals comprised of prawn cocktails, boeuf bourguignon and Black Forest cake.  Back then, as strange as it may seem, those who held such beliefs weren’t branded as kooks, they were admired as a ‘deep thinkers’.

Neither were we new-agers ‘religious’.  If God featured at all in this popular literature, it was as a watered-down, amorphous, deistic kind of God.  The after-life was not lived in ‘heaven’ but on ‘another plane’.  God did not judge you – you judged yourself.  For those dwelling on the ‘other side’ God, if he existed at all, was a distant deity. He was certainly not the kind of guy who was going to greet you with a firm hand-shake at the pearly gates.

In those days, I didn’t think much about whether I believed in God or not.  But, I do remember being shocked to my core when I  read Shirley MacLaine’s theory that ‘God’ may be no more (or perhaps, no less!) than gluon – the substance that holds ‘quarks’ together.  At the time, I didn’t realize the sensation that my brain was exploding was symptomatic of my first introduction to new-age quantum theology!

By the early 90s, when my hair was blonde and fluffy, my dresses pastel-silk polyester and I was most likely to be found on a plane to somewhere; you might have peered across the aisle to catch me reading The Celestine Prophecy.  You may also have heard me muttering, “This makes no sense!  What a load of crap! Is this guy for real? Back up!  What??????

I’m pretty sure I waited until I was back home in my tastefully decorated, dove grey and pastel pink apartment before I hurled The Celestine Prophecy, unfinished, across the room in a fit of pique.  Sanity was, at last setting in.

The 90s was a great  time for book-hurling.  L Ron Hubbard’s Dianetics was also thrown against the wardrobe that housed my $1000 business suits and demure court shoes.  Poor old Bryce Courtenay’s The Power of One found itself airborne before I’d finished the third chapter – admittedly, more for the terrible writing than its content.

As new age ideas began to appear more out of date than the leopard print polyester cat-suit and crocheted vest crumpled at the bottom of my wardrobe,  my interest shifted from spirituality towards literature which questioned the divinity of Jesus.

Frank Yerby’s fictional Jesus, My Brother, made a huge impact on me while I was still at school.  Now,  as I watched the effect of Christian fundamentalism on my brother and his family, I rekindled that interest by reading The Human Christ by Charlotte Allen, The Secret Life of Jesus by Robert Macklin, The Qumran Origins of the Christian Church by Barbara Thiering, Testament: The Bible and History by John Romer and The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail by Michael Baigent, Richard Leigh and Henry Lincoln.

Please don’t think I read these uncritically!  I wasn’t being indoctrinated, I was following a line of thought.

Soon after I entered university as a mature-age student, (my business suits languishing in the wardrobe as I dressed – according to my new, lowly station in life –  in jeans and t-shirts), I discovered John Shelby Spong’s Rescuing the Bible from Fundamentalism: A Bishop Rethinks the Meaning of Scripture and Why Christianity Must Change or Die: A Bishop Speaks to Believers In Exile.  Spong lucidly expressed my own growing conviction that the supernatural finery in which Jesus was clothed was a conceit.  That led, inevitably, to a growing realization that the new-age philosophies I’d embraced as a young woman might, equally, have no substance.

University provided me with the techniques and training essential in the critical analysis of both academic papers and works of literature.  While I still held fast (but considerably less dogmatically) to some new-age beliefs I slowly came to realize that just because something is comforting doesn’t mean it’s true.

The scales began to fall from my eyes – but not completely.  Now, I conceded that most psychics were probably frauds – but possibly not all.  Similarly,  I admitted there was no credible evidence for reincarnation – but argued that it was harmless for me to maintain my belief in it, providing I was neither dogmatic nor evangelistic.

My father died when I was 26.  He’d been having problems with his heart and, one day while I was out with my mother, he just dropped dead on the kitchen floor.  A friend who was visiting him, called the ambulance.  By the time we came home (no mobile phones then!) he was in the morgue.  I never saw him again.

During those dark days the thought that he was ‘still with me’ was hugely comforting.  So comforting that despite the fact that I loved him deeply, I have never shed a tear for him.

As my mother tried to deal with her grief, I cleaned out his wardrobe, sold his catamaran and bundled up his toothbrush, razor, aftershave, etc. and put them into the bin without a second thought.  But, when my hand lighted on his contact lenses, I just couldn’t throw them out.  Somehow, these were too personal.  I held them in my hand for a moment then, gently put them back into the bathroom drawer.

“Not yet,” I murmured, “I’ll throw them out one day, but not now.  They don’t take up much room.”

“One day.” I told myself, “it won’t hurt anymore.  But,  today,  it does.  So just be kind to yourself and leave them where they are.”

My dogged belief that my dead father somehow guided my life persisted until quite recently.  Confirmation bias ensured that I found plenty of ‘evidence’ to support my belief.

By now I was retired and living with my mother.  I’d discarded the skinny clothes of yore to those more befitting a matron who was (as my GP so tactlessly described me) ‘female, fat and forty’.  Intellectually, I knew that an afterlife and reincarnation were as unlikely to be true as Jesus rising bodily into heaven (or me fitting into that size 16 jacket I tenaciously held onto in the hope that one day I’d lose the damned weight!).  But, I adopted the same attitude to my increasingly ill-fitting spiritual beliefs as I did to Dad’s contact lenses:

“They’re ridiculous ideas which should really should be jettisoned – but, not yet. It hurts no-one for me to nurse this one little piece of irrationality.  And, one day, I’ll let it go – not just now.”

Towards the end of 2006, I heard about two books by Sam Harris, The End of Faith and Letter to a Christian Nation.  Inevitably, as I looked for more information on them,  I also discovered Richard Dawkins’ newly published, The God Delusion.

An elderly friend gave me $60 for Christmas in 2006 and I used it to buy all three.  I took them away with me on holidays in January and, by the time I returned, I was describing myself with the ‘A’ word for the first time ever.  While I had never, really, been a Christian, the first time I said, “I am not a Christian” aloud, I’ll admit to an odd queasy feeling as I vaguely wondered whether I might be struck  by lightning.

I think it’s really important to say that reading Harris and Dawkins didn’t make me an atheist.  I’d been an atheist for a very long time – albeit an atheist with some rather strange new-age delusions.  What Harris and Dawkins did was to make me clean out my intellectual wardrobe.  They were, in a way, Trinny and Susannah, or the Queer Eye for the Straight Guy team.  I could almost imagine them flinging open my mind and gasping, “You’re not still keeping this old thing, are you?  Come on girlfriend!  We don’t care if you love it, you don’t need it any more – it’s gotta go!”

I clung on for a while but, as I read more, began to talk to atheists on the internet, and tested out the possibility of discarding the last vestiges of my sadly out-dated spiritual attire, I realized I’d reached a stage in my life where truth was more important to me than the comfort of delusion.

The white vinyl jacket, the six-inch wedges, the four-inch shoulder pads, the ridiculously expensive suits and the size 14  jeans have long since been banished from my wardrobe.  Isn’t it right that the ideas and beliefs that no longer fit, that couldn’t stand up to the wear and tear of critical thought, and which, ultimately, proved to be bigger fashion faux-pas than a pair of Pucci hotpants, have also been discarded?

Chrys Stevenson